One of the biggest challenges in winning over the Early Majority is that they want to be able to choose among a set of vendors with similar value propositions. They want competition for their dollars.
However, if you've done your work in creating a new and compelling value proposition, you might not have any competition.
So, your task in this step is to define the battle ground so that you have the best chance of winning.
In order to do that we have do two things.
First, we need to lead with market-centric attributes instead of product-centric attributes.
Here are some examples to make this point clear.
Product-centric attributes: fastest product, easiest to use, elegant architecture, product price, unique functionality.
Market-centric attributes: largest installed base, most third party suppliers, de facto standard, cost of ownership, quality of support.
Second, the product-centric attributes need to be clearly positioned against your competition. We don't have enough time to review everything the book says about positioning here, but you can refer to our summary on the seminal book Positioning to get a clear picture.
For now, here's what the end result of your positioning should sound like:
For (target customers - the beachhead segment only), who are dissatisfied with (the current market alternative), our product is a (new product category), that provides (key problem-solving capability), unlike (the product alternative), we have assembled (key whole product features for your specific application).